The 72-hour event notice is a first check, not the final event story. Article 14 calls for broad facts then known. It needs a first check of the event and fixes or risk steps already taken.
Show doubt without vague words. State what took place and which product guard was harmed or could be harmed. Give the proof for the event level and the steps that are now in place.
Keep three timelines
Keep three times apart: when the event was found, when it took place if known, and when the Article 14 trigger was known. Each answers a different point. If the event time is a range, keep the range and how it was found.
Keep response steps apart too. A limit on harm, a user short-term step, and a lasting fix are not the same. Record the scope and end proof for each.
Describe the incident through the product
Start with the product and versions at risk. Then state the event and the product guard or harmful-code path used in the severe test. Keep harm to firm systems, user service, and product security in separate parts. Link them only when proof shows the link.
Give each scope claim a proof link. If one version is proved and nearby ones are still under test, say so. Do not add all products just to be safe. Do not limit scope to the first build just for ease.
Build the initial assessment as an argument
Name the severe-event test used, proof for it, proof against it, open doubt, and reviewer. Then state the current event level and harm. Do not call an idea a seen fact. A first report can still state the exact basis for its view.
Link each response step to the check. Record the risk or path it treats, release, state, owner, and test proof. Keep a planned act apart from one already done.
Make the initial assessment reviewable
The first check should link proof to the severe-event test. List proof against the result and other open views. Do not hide them in broad text. Give each open point an owner. Decide if it may change the report before the due time.
Keep the filed 72-hour copy. The final report should add to and fix it with a clear change log. It must not replace it with no trace.
Before filing, compare the maker, product, track, awareness time, event range, scope, and response state with the early warning. Fix small name errors. Explain changes from new proof. Raise legal clashes instead of editing them out.
The final-report handoff should name open cause points and proof owners. Add risk steps still under way. Keep the 72-hour filing time that starts the next stage.
Continue this workflow with the early-warning packet and the incident final-report workflow.