ActLume blog
Practical guidance for CRA Article 14 reporting.
Understand manufacturer readiness, incident coordination, deadlines, staged reports, and the human-controlled ENISA SRP handoff.
Published articles
50 available Subscribe via RSS
-
When must a final-product manufacturer report an actively exploited vulnerability in a third-party component?
When a component triggers CRA reporting
A supplier's exploited flaw does not answer the final-product question; the manufacturer must establish whether its own product contains and is affected by it.
-
What should a manufacturer do after identifying a vulnerability in a third-party component integrated into its product?
Build the CRA handoff to a component maintainer
The CRA requires manufacturers that identify an integrated-component vulnerability to report it upstream and address it in their own product.
-
How should a manufacturer map a vulnerable component to affected product versions for CRA reporting?
Map vulnerable components to CRA product versions
CRA reporting needs product-specific information, so component evidence must resolve to shipped product versions rather than stop at a dependency name.
-
How should a manufacturer keep identifiers coherent across an Article 14 reporting case?
Keep stable CRA case identifiers
Use one internal case anchor to reconcile the manufacturer, product, affected versions, evidence, and staged Article 14 submissions.
-
How should a manufacturer determine which Member States to identify in a CRA early warning?
Build the Member State record for a CRA warning
The CRA early warning identifies, where applicable, Member States where the manufacturer knows the product was made available.
-
How should a manufacturer prepare vulnerability-awareness records before Article 14 reporting starts?
Prepare a pre-deadline exploitation baseline
Article 14 reporting applies from 11 September 2026, so manufacturers need a dated baseline that separates earlier evidence from later awareness events.
-
Do CRA Article 14 reporting obligations apply to manufacturers established outside the European Union?
CRA reporting for manufacturers outside the EU
Manufacturer location does not remove CRA reporting when an in-scope product is made available on the Union market.
-
When does the CRA treat an importer or distributor as the manufacturer for reporting purposes?
When CRA supply-chain firms become manufacturers
An importer or distributor takes manufacturer obligations, including Articles 13 and 14, when it uses its own name or trademark or substantially modifies the product.
-
Which Article 14 reporting duties apply to an open-source software steward?
CRA reporting duties for open-source stewards
Article 24 links steward vulnerability reporting to development involvement and severe-incident reporting to development systems the steward provides.
-
Does maintaining an open-source project make a person an open-source software steward under the CRA?
Is an open-source maintainer a CRA steward?
A CRA open-source software steward is a legal person providing systematic, sustained support for specified software intended for commercial activities.
-
How should a manufacturer resolve conflicting evidence about whether a vulnerability is actively exploited under the CRA?
Resolve conflicting CRA exploitation signals
A CRA active-exploitation decision turns on reliable evidence of malicious use without the system owner's permission, not on a label or score alone.
-
How should a manufacturer decide whether an enterprise security incident is also a CRA severe incident affecting a product?
Separate product security and enterprise incidents
CRA severe-incident reporting concerns an incident that affects or can affect a product's ability to protect specified data or functions, or enables malicious code.